Glen Point trial reveals Morgan Stanley tried to buy back option

Mr Henderson testified that banks often actively trade as currencies approach option barriers. “They’re going to reduce the risk of them not being hedged,” he said. “There’s a lot of increased hedging activity as the barrier gets closer.”

In opening statements earlier on Tuesday, Assistant US Attorney Kiersten Ann Fletcher likened the option to a 10-to-one bet placed by Mr Phillips.

“If he got it right and his bet paid off, he stood to make $US20 million,” Ms Fletcher told the jury. But when “it looked like the market wasn’t going the way he thought it would he didn’t just accept his losses and walk away. No. He cheated. He made the market move his way. In the middle of the night on Christmas this man took the markets into his own hands.”

Mr Phillips’ lawyer, Jenna Dabbs, told the jury that his moves were completely lawful and permissible and instead reflected his skill and prescience in the market.

“It was precisely the trading you would expect from somebody with experience as an investor and trader,” Ms Dabbs said.

Morgan Stanley’s offer to buy back the option coincided with Cyril Ramaphosa’s victory in the African National Congress election, virtually guaranteeing he would win South Africa’s national election. Mr Phillips has argued that his strategy was based on a bet that Ramaphosa’s win would cause the rand to rise.

PE partner juror

The jury that’s hearing the case likely varies in its familiarity with Wall Street and finance, though one juror is a partner at a private equity firm. The nine women and three men also include a home health care aide, a Sunday school teacher, and a purveyor of cotton candy.

Prosecutors are expected to call witnesses from a number of financial institutions, including Morgan Stanley. But US District Judge Lewis Liman on Monday blocked direct testimony by three proposed government witnesses from Goldman Sachs, Barclays and Bank of America. The proposed witnesses weren’t identified, but prosecutors said they worked at the bank in a compliance function.

In a conference with Judge Liman, defence lawyer Sean Hecker said those witnesses lacked relevant experience.

“None of these witnesses, to my understanding, are going to be traders who were in the market at the time and could testify as to their reasonable expectations,” Mr Hecker said. He compared compliance witnesses to having a police officer testify about the speed limit on the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway.

“It actually doesn’t tell you whether people are speeding or reasonably expecting people to speed,” he said.

The case is US v. Mr Phillips, 22-cr-138, US District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

Bloomberg